Introduction
Previously published data from STENTS reported the time course of stent-associated symptoms (SAS) and factors associated with increased pain. However, there remains a paucity of information regarding the location and site-specific intensity of stent-associated pain. We hypothesized that differences in these factors may exist between sexes due to dissimilar genitourinary anatomy and voiding patterns, and that differences may exist based on stone location. The objective of this analysis was to characterize pain location and intensity after URS and ureteral stent, and to describe differences between sexes and primary stone location.
Materials
STENTS participants completed questionnaires at baseline and on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, 5, 7-9, and 30 days after stent removal. Pain distribution and intensity were characterized with the Brief Pain Inventory, in which participants localized specific sites of pain using a detailed body map, indicating the site of most intense pain at each time point. These findings were stratified by sex and primary stone location.
Results
,424 participants enrolled in STENTS at five US health systems; 47% were female and mean age was 49 years (SD 17). The dominant stone location was 50% renal and 50% ureteral. The most frequent sites of pain were the back followed by abdomen and pubic region, all ipsilateral to the stone. Of these 3 sites, the site of most intense pain on POD 1 was equally reported in the ipsilateral back (38%) and abdomen (38%) followed by pubic region (24%). On POD 5, 42% reported pain in the ipsilateral back as most intense, followed by abdomen (34%) and pubic region (24%).
Men were more likely to report ipsilateral back as the most intense pain site on POD 1 (p = 0.003) and POD5 (p = 0.007), independent of dominant stone location. Women more often reported pain in the abdominal region on POD1 (p = 0.008) and in the pubic region on POD3 (p = 0.003). Compared to those with ureteral stones, those with a dominant renal stone were more likely to: 1) have ipsilateral back pain on POD 1-5 (p < 0.05) and 2) report a higher pain intensity score at various sites and timepoints.
Conclusion
Pain distribution after URS with ureteral stent, including location of most severe pain, changed over time, and differed between sexes and by stone location. These results facilitate counseling and may contribute to a better understanding of the patient experience and identification of patient pain phenotypes.
Funding
US National Institutes of Health/NIDDK
Lead Authors
Andrew Rabley,
University of Washington
Co-Authors
Naim Maalouf,
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Hongqiu Yang,
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Alana Desai,
University of Washington
Peter Reese,
University of Pennsylvania
Gregory Tasian,
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Hunter Wessells,
University of Washington
Hussein Al-Khalidi,
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Henry Lai,
Washington University in St. Louis
Michele Curatolo,
University of Washington
Jodi Antonelli,
Duke Urology
Matthew Sorensen,
University of Washington
Rob Sweet,
University of Washington
Ziya Kirkali,
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Charles Scales,
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Urology
Characterizing pain location and intensity following ureteroscopy for stones – Results from the USDRN STudy to Enhance uNderstanding of sTent-associated Symptoms (STENTS)
Category
Abstract
Description
MP05: 14Session Name:Moderated Poster Session 05: Stones - Ureteroscopy 1