Presented by: Rohan Batra M.S, D.N.B ( Urology)
Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India

Introduction

The Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is a promising new tool in the field of endoscopic laser lithotripsy, but is it efficacious in managing large stones using flexible ureteroscopy remains to be seen. Our objective was to analyse the clinical efficiency of TFL in large volume stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Materials

Patients with large volume renal stones (>1000mm3) and size of 15-25mm, operated at two different centres, from May 2020 to April 2021, were enrolled.

RIRS was performed using 60W Superpulse thulium fiber laserTM (IPG Photonics, Russia).

Demographic data, stone parameters, lasing time, total operating time were recorded, laser efficacy(J/mm3) and ablation speed(mm3/sec) were calculated.

Complications were assessed using Clavien Dindo grading.

NCCT KUB was done at 1 month post operatively to calculate stone free rate.

Results

,

A total of 76 patients were included and analysed in the study. Mean stone volume was 1860.79 ± 1172.61 (1169.27-2193.25) mm3 Mean stone density was 1099.80 ± 313.65 (875.00-1317.00) HU . Mean laser time was 537.79 ± 689.89 (21.00-1080.00) sec, mean total operating time was 43.38± 12.96 (35.00-51.25) min, Mean laser efficacy was 20.30 ± 15.5 (8.88-25.57) J/mm3 Mean ablation speed was 1.32 ± 0.7 (0.82-1.64) mm3/sec A strong positive correlation between stone volume and ablation speed  (r = 0.659, p = 0.000), A moderate negative correlation between volume and laser efficacy (J/mm3)  (r = -0.392, p = 0.000). With increasing volume of the stone, J/mm3 decreased significantly and ablation speed increased significantly (p<0.001).  Complications occurred in 21.05% (16/76) patients, most of which were Clavien grades 1-2. Overall Stone free rate is 96.05%.

Conclusion

With an increase is stone volume, laser efficiency increases as less energy is required to ablate every mm3 of stone.

Funding

None

Lead Authors

Abhishek Singh, MCh Urology
Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital

Co-Authors

Soundarya G, Urologist
Preeti Hospitals

Chandramohan V,
Preeti Hospitals

Abhijit Patil, MCh Urology
Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital

Arvind Ganpule, DNB Urology
Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital

Ravindra Sabnis, MCh Urology
Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital

Mahesh Desai,
Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital